I did Ranke too! With Bloch and Bede.rofl am l the only one who did the enlightenment historians (gibbon/von ranke) because their the only ones l studied D:
l felt like l sat a different exam from you guys lol
I did exacty what you did!!!!Hey i did both Gibbon and Ranke for the first part!! I started off my argument with some nonsense interpretation of what Foner was saying, but developed a thesis as i went on, so i guess it was ok - wrote 9 pages
The second question sucked according to me, didnt lend itself to an analysis of methodology or context of historians in the Tacitus case study. Not a horrendous source, just not the best they could've given us. Its funny because i looked at the past HSC papers and all Section 2 quotes were pretty decent, except 2008! And this years quote was very similar to the 08 one so yea..=/ Wrote 8 pages
ITS OVERRRRRR THOUGH =D
wow you had time to count!? LOLQuestion 1 - I referred to E.H.Carr mostly and then some for Herodotus and then a little on Natelie Davis.Only write 5 and half pages for this but well over 1000-words. I even counted!
Question 2 - I waffled on this with JFK a lot.I didnt really link it the question a lot and just went on about JFK and the debates.Wrote 7 pages worth of waffling on.
THANK GOD HSC IS OVERRRRR.