Howard Supporters?? (1 Viewer)

[walrusbear]

They already get shitloads anyway.

 

[heman]

actually teachers get pretty good pay in comparision with say nurses
i saw in the smh once nurses starting pay was 40k or soemthing like that compared to the teachers 50k
and teachers get more holidays as well

but thats got nothing to do with unionism
im not a fan of it because it will make the economy less efficient
Howards reform of the wage determinations system was good for productivity and eco growth

 

[lengstar]

rey, howard ppls! hahahaaaaaa, finally sum1 who shares my point of view! considering i goto a CATHOLIC skool, which if u think about it means the teachers are very very left-wing, my english teacher praises latham, n as sed previously, states hes a breath of fresh air, which is might b true in the sense that hes a new moronic person who goes after the popular choices and is maing probable false promises, but neways, howard.....if it aint broke, y fix it?

i cant vote, but im sick of labor, so in 4 more yrs it wont be latham

ohh yeh, soz, but when i sed catholic i have nothing against catholics, but its just that they seem to be mainly labor supporters, n yeh, catholic skool supports labor, etc etc, so i hope i dont offend ne1

if it ain't broke why fix it?
there was nothing wrong with saddam's government, it was working well. so why did the united states want to fix it? *rolls eyes

 

[Generator]

Stop comparing apples and oranges (i.e., teachers and nurses). Such issues have already been debated at length.

 

[walrusbear]

if it ain't broke why fix it?
there was nothing wrong with saddam's government, it was working well. so why did the united states want to fix it? *rolls eyes

how moronic is that phrase, eh?
'if it ain't broke, why fix it'

 

[lengstar]

thorrnydevil: love the idiot list esp. #1

says alot about your character, or lack of it, now doesn't it?

 

[PenelopeK]

says alot about your character, or lack of it, now doesn't it?

i dont think so. it wasnt anything personal.. just some humour.... "or lack of it"???

 

[Nick]

i thought voting liberal meant you had to compassion for your fellow man?

yea, "man"

man= white male high income earning conservative who agrees with you on everything

 

[Nick]

anti-'war on terror' voter right here.

so you're pro terror?

no wonder you're voting howard then, considering hes most likely to inflame terrorist acts against australia

 

[thorrnydevil]

actually teachers get pretty good pay in comparision with say nurses
i saw in the smh once nurses starting pay was 40k or soemthing like that compared to the teachers 50k
and teachers get more holidays as well

but thats got nothing to do with unionism
im not a fan of it because it will make the economy less efficient
Howards reform of the wage determinations system was good for productivity and eco growth

I agree, nurses are under paid (compared with teachers who get 12 weeks of holidays, on top of there 4 weeks). Then again, I'm mum is a nurse so I'm biased.

 

[thorrnydevil]

so you're pro terror?

no wonder you're voting howard then, considering hes most likely to inflame terrorist acts against australia

mmm...compared with Latham who wants to stick his head in the sand.

 

[Nick]

ok genius

lets compare

doing nothing against being part of an invasion in the second holiest muslim land

which is going to give more ammunition to people like Osama to say the West is waging a war against Islam and therefore recruit the numbers of young islamists they need to go through with and fund terrorist attacks

 

[tWiStEdD]

Nick:
I clearly did not mean that.
Kindly keep quiet if you have nothing of consequence to say.

 

[tWiStEdD]

It's Usama, actually. The USA didnt like the way that USAma... well you get the picture.

the war on terror is fuelling terrorist activity. I dont know how you reach your conclusions.

 

[PenelopeK]

It's Usama, actually. The USA didnt like the way that USAma... well you get the picture.

the war on terror is fuelling terrorist activity. I dont know how you reach your conclusions.

twisted: people dont know wat to base there conclusions on. i guess we're the only ppl who read into wat we are standing up for

 

[Nick]

Nick:
I clearly did not mean that.
Kindly keep quiet if you have nothing of consequence to say.

tWiStEd:
i clearly did not mean that literally
kindly appreciate my satirical take on a black and white "with us or against us" view of issues.

and to your second post, this "war on terror" is nice as a phrase, but what has howard done so far that could conceivably be an act against terror

1) invaded iraq

end.

now what has that done; fuelled terrorist activity

therefore, howard has fuelled terrorist activity

does that make it clearer?

 

[walrusbear]

how come you people are against the 'war on terror' but still support howard, one of its biggest advocates?

 

[Nick]

twisted: people dont know wat to base there conclusions on. i guess we're the only ppl who read into wat we are standing up for

hahahah, so people who are pro howard base their conclusions well and read into what they are standing up for


could this possibly be translated into, people who agree with you are right and everyone else is stupid?

 

[PenelopeK]

no i didnt mean that at all. its that many ppl who are pro-labor tend to bring up the war on terrorism yet, they have no knowledge of the situation

 

[Nick]

no i didnt mean that at all. its that many ppl who are pro-labor tend to bring up the war on terrorism yet, they have no knowledge of the situation

.. this is where you share some knowledge of the situation that you have so you don't just sound like an idiot who will say anything