Legal Studies Predictions/Thoughts (15 Viewers)

[thicckoolkid]

nah i know but like i did diff human rights issues ykwim? like some ppl apparantly thought it was specifically one contemporary issue and i did more ykwim?

Nah I don't think it's an issue. Also, I'm pretty sure it said "example", not contemporary issue, which they normally specify.

 

[ajksdfoasiudh]

div and separation

wouldn't it be rule of law tho? no state is above constitution.?

 

[civiclens]

for legal measures, did anyone split it up into domestic and international human rights legal measures?

 

[ajksdfoasiudh]

for legal measures, did anyone split it up into domestic and international human rights legal measures?

i did one international for child soldiers then 2 domestic for religion + same sex equality before the law

 

[thicckoolkid]

wouldn't it be rule of law tho? no state is above constitution.?

Nah I think its seperation and division because it outlines that only the federal government can make descisions on currency

 

[nini00]

div and separation i believe. that is a dot point in human rights, so i will assume that is right

i get why it has to be division but i couldn't find any reason why it'd be separation as well (i still put that answer anyway i think but idk if it's right)

 

[ajksdfoasiudh]

Nah I think its seperation and division because it outlines that only the federal government can make descisions on currency

yeah but isnt that js directly division? and then rule of law reinforces why?

 

[thicckoolkid]

but the 4th option was free trade no? also why would they specify individual rights if the answer would be a collective right

Wouldn't free trade also be a collective right, even more so than religion? And I'm fairly sure that it wasn't an option.

 

[nini00]

the other option it could be was division of powers and procedural fairness? i lowk forgot what that was tho

 

[civiclens]

wouldn't it be rule of law tho? no state is above constitution.?

actually that is possible. but im pretty sure 51 gives power for currency, and the high court is separation of powers. that was a tricky one...

 

[thicckoolkid]

yeah but isnt that js directly division? and then rule of law reinforces why?

wait omg was div and rule of law an option

 

[ajksdfoasiudh]

wait omg was div and rule of law an option

i think so or i'm js dumb and misread div as sep

 

[civiclens]

the other option it could be was division of powers and procedural fairness? i lowk forgot what that was tho

i feel like it is such an unrealistic scenario though. because the federal government would just legislate around it...

 

[thicckoolkid]

actually that is possible. but im pretty sure 51 gives power for currency, and the high court is separation of powers. that was a tricky one...

wait true because Sec 51 is Legislation and judiarcy is courts so it would be seperation because of how it is enforced

 

[civiclens]

wait omg was div and rule of law an option

it might be one of them ones where they just make both right.

 

[coryo_]

my teach said it was div and seperation, not sure if that helps any

 

[nini00]

also religion can be an individual and collective right i think

 

[civiclens]

my teach said it was div and seperation, not sure if that helps any

i think that is right!! because i was think that the syllabus had a dotpoint relating to both.. but idk traumatised from the mcqs

 

[thicckoolkid]

i feel like it is such an unrealistic scenario though. because the federal government would just legislate around it...

Yeah and I'm fairly sure procedural fairness is decided by legislation and courts which is just seperation of powers

 

[civiclens]

also religion can be an individual and collective right i think

the way it is written is like "the state will not interfere with religion". it was the most accurate i think