Muslims plot to take over australia (1 Viewer)

Joined
Jan 12, 2010
Messages
808
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
Are you retarded?
In 1927 he spoke those words.
He was enticing the people, gaining their trust, particularly after the destruction WW1 prompted, and the hyper-inflation Germany suffered in the years after the war.
 

Calculon

Mohammed was a paedophile
Joined
Feb 15, 2004
Messages
1,743
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Took total control of industry

just like chavez
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2010
Messages
808
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
Took total control of industry

just like chavez
So did the Kaiser (who was the leader of an authoritarian nation) during WW1. War socialism in WW1 was so 'genius' to many, and Hitler undertook the same scheme in total control, but his core principles were extremely right wing. He was no leftist.
 

diana_a

New Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2009
Messages
12
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
WTF is that?? I know it could be true... why does Ausssie govt allow such pimps to dwell in their land. I just hope they never succeed in what they're plotting.

PS: Muslims have become pain in the ass. They don't have a religion anymore. Bloody terrorists!!!!
Wow, & that's coming from someone with "Lets find PEACE together" as their signature,
Real smart!
 

Yasser Arafat

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
331
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
you took over france though

Edit: not like it would be hard lolol





anyway like i said, the reason that islam is dangerous right now , compared to say christianity, is that islam is practised in backwards countries such as afghanistan, iraq, pakistan, somalia etc. so the adherants automatically seem to be backwards digusting people (hint: most of them are. but it is due to their culture and socioeconomic status). whereas christians these days are from the most affluent and free countries so they dont have anything to fight for. both religions are equally shit, but in this current climate, muslims come from shit countries and therefore are more backwards generally.

backwards in the sense of their perception of freedom and shit
 
Last edited:

Calculon

Mohammed was a paedophile
Joined
Feb 15, 2004
Messages
1,743
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. ( United States ).

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel. – Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’

It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.
 

Bereie

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
237
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
you took over france though

Edit: not like it would be hard lolol





anyway like i said, the reason that islam is dangerous right now , compared to say christianity, is that islam is practised in backwards countries such as afghanistan, iraq, pakistan, somalia etc. so the adherants automatically seem to be backwards digusting people (hint: most of them are. but it is due to their culture and socioeconomic status). whereas christians these days are from the most affluent and free countries so they dont have anything to fight for. both religions are equally shit, but in this current climate, muslims come from shit countries and therefore are more backwards generally.

backwards in the sense of their perception of freedom and shit
Yes but there are other ways of judging whether a country is backward. Saudi Arabia and Qatar for example, rich oil countries. Both of these countries kill people for Apostasy (Leaving the religion). Qatar jails/fines for homosexuality, and Saudi Arabia either kills/jails/fines/whips for it. Those are just two examples of their disgusting shit sand-monkey laws.
This is not because there's something wrong with their socioeconomic status it's because they have made the decision to implement barbaric religious laws. Their religion is violent, backward and oppressive and has no place in the 21st century, let alone in the legal system of any country.
 

Bereie

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
237
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
They also haven't gone through an enlightenment like the Christians and Jews did, and look where they are now. Secularism/Atheism and freedom of religion doesn't even really exist in those countries, and criticism of religion = death sentence if you criticize Islam.
 

Anonymous-

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
147
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Yes but there are other ways of judging whether a country is backward. Saudi Arabia and Qatar for example, rich oil countries. Both of these countries kill people for Apostasy (Leaving the religion). Qatar jails/fines for homosexuality, and Saudi Arabia either kills/jails/fines/whips for it. Those are just two examples of their disgusting shit sand-monkey laws.
This is not because there's something wrong with their socioeconomic status it's because they have made the decision to implement barbaric religious laws. Their religion is violent, backward and oppressive and has no place in the 21st century, let alone in the legal system of any country.
suck a muslim cock m8
 

Alexeyevich

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
5
Location
Central Coast
Gender
Male
HSC
2000
In my home country solution is simple!

We send one group to one factory and send other group to other factory If one cause troubles we explode the factory!
 

skyline

Proud Aurion TRD owner
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
437
Location
up your buthole
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
= terrorists are not Muslims

lol thats funny, an undeniable statement made

Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.

i never heard of a terrorist, unless that terrorist was a muslim

should i sig this? lol
 

russs

yeeeee
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
291
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
It's actually quite simple: set harsh rules in the country - adapt or leave.

Russia, although a much higher muslim population has less "social" problems with Muslims than a few other (cough. France... UK.. cough ) European countries. There is no white guilt, a strong national identity and there is no pussy-footing around the problem by lefties like it is here. Ignore their demands (extra "tolerance". etc), stop catering to their needs - and the problem will dissolve. Any kind of proven hate speech - deportation, brutal punishment or hefty jail time.

You don't tolerate the intolerant.

And stop voting in Labor to bring more of them here.
 

russs

yeeeee
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
291
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Lol assimilation? Yeah, that worked quite well with the aboriginies.
Aboriginals are an entirely different case - they were here before any of us.

I don't even know where to start with the Aboriginal situation, somehow I think the problem is insolvable.
 

scuba_steve2121

On The Road To Serfdom
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
1,343
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
are you a fucken retard, Right Wingers are people like Hitler you stupid fuck, get ur facts right. N no I don't wanna live in both I want to live in a social democratic country like Australia, I bet u don't even know what Social Democrats are like.
I know this thread is old but there was no way i was gonna let that slide

The definitions of left and right are ever more increasingly getting confused, so I will try to clarify.

There are two types of right wingers, right wing libertarians and right wing authoritarians.

Right wing libertarians are those that focus more on liberty for an individual, minimal state or no state at all. they love capitalism, minimal economic state intervention and focus on private property rights, also they tend to be atheist.

Right wing authoritarians are more like the republican party in America or the liberal party here. of course both these parties are not extreme right wing at all more in the center of the right wing or closer to the middle.

These parties like like but don't love capitalism. having things like a federal reserve and taxes gives these governments their power. they use this power to nudge or push the economy into doing what it wants. they do this through deficit spending and mild economic regulations but they never directly tell or control most of it. But as we know there are public goods that they control directly e.g. water. so they like capitalism but they want to control it a little

Now what separates them from libertarians is not only having a bigger government but that they limit civil liberties. They do this to what they think the majority of the public wants. e.g banning drugs or guns. It is also apparent that they will impose limits on your liberty based on religion.

OK now as with right wingers there are the two types of left wingers, authoritarian and libertarian respectably.

As u can guess left wing authoritarians fall under the category of fascists (Hitler) and socialists. Now socialists have a massive government and at the extreme end of the scale they control not only the economy through direct ownership but your life practically. They limit civil liberties to what they think is best which is code for u can't do anything. Basically creating a totalitarian state north Korea is a good example of this.

The main differences between socialism and fascism is that with socialism government directly owns business. With fascism they don't own it but they tell it what to do and if it doesn't comply...well..... Anyways again with fascism civil liberties are limited. Sometimes not as extreme as in socialism and not as leaning as in a medium right wing authoritarian government. So basically socialism and fascism have almost the same outcome its just how they got there that is different

AND THIS is why most people get confused where to put Hitler on a political spectrum. left wingers will say he is right, while right wingers will say he is left because neither want to be associated with him. People think racism equals right when it doesn't it can be on both wings and that again is another major factor that makes people say he was a right winger. Personally because he controlled the economy and did limit civil liberties a lot. I would say middle of the left wing but high up in authoritarian. However hes still an evil fascist, plus when your that much of a authoritarian it doesn't matter what wing you are and i think everybody can agree with that.

OK lastly left wing libertarians these guys basically want either big state controlling the economy while having freedom for all when it comes to civil liberties. Unfortunately this position is sort of ironic because through big government will come limited civil liberties, can't have it both ways but they would like to think that u can.

The second type of left wing libertarians want wealth shared equally, no capitalism no government. these are stereotypical basic hippies. However there is a middle ground where they create a form of communism. Smart hippies like Gandhi had the idea with his ashrams.

Of course these hippies can go even more radical where u get people that want to wipe out the human race to save the environment.

these are the left and right types that u can be, if u disagree with my definitions please state why because they may not be the most accurate but i reckon they are pretty dam close. so in conclusion next time you call Hitler a dirty left or right winger u may want to pause and think about it.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top