Private schools are tops. Private selective ones are even better....in fact they are the best. I am referring to one particularly well known Sydney example. I had the opportunity to attend Ruse, but chose not to because I am not a peasant
How do you gauge "best" if not by receiving the consistently best results across the statePrivate schools are tops. Private selective ones are even better....in fact they are the best. I am referring to one particularly well known Sydney example. I had the opportunity to attend Ruse, but chose not to because I am not a peasant
but so does baulkham hills and sydney boysThats exactly how Im judging my school.....anyway, it provides a well rounded learning center with a balance of sport and music etc. That kind of stuff
Thats exactly how Im judging my school.....anyway, it provides a well rounded learning center with a balance of sport and music etc. That kind of stuff
their*selective public, because everyone is there because they want to be, not becuase there parents are rich.
(I think that's what he was saying with the "selective public" part)their*
also, confirmed public school kid
Thanks but no thanks. I cbf worrying about my grammar on an internet forum.their*
also, confirmed public school kid
I meant more of consensuses not perceptions of individual schools. (though i guess "based purely" was a bit harsh)yeah no they're not always actually
You shouldn't have to worry, you should just be able to type properly. Gosh.Thanks but no thanks. I cbf worrying about my grammar on an internet forum.
KENT 1 said:Thats exactly how Im judging my school.....anyway, it provides a well rounded learning center with a balance of sport and music etc. That kind of stuff
+1.but so does baulkham hills and sydney boys