Raw mark required to achieve Band 5 or 6 in Sciences. (1 Viewer)

Divinity_

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
241
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
What is the raw mark (approximately) required to a achieve a Band 5 or 6 in the main 3 sciences (Phyiscs, Chemistry, Bio).
 

MrDimple

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
259
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
so in order of scaling well

chem > physics > bio

what would you get a raw mark in bio to get a band 5-6
 

hollaholla

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
386
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
???? Last year physics + eco scaled better than chem am i wrong??

Physics i heard was 83
Chem i would say around 85
Bio like 90 LOL.---dosn scale too well
 

MrDimple

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
259
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
hmm so if i got a 80 in bio that would be decent?

whats a decent mark in bio so it doesn't affect your ATAR?
 

shady145

Banned
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
1,687
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
phys>chem>eco
the differences in scaling here are very small so it wnt effect it much
phys b6 ~82/83 but has been as low as 78 as in 2005
chem around the same, also been around 78
bio i'm not sure
 

Finx

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
375
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
hmm so if i got a 80 in bio that would be decent?

whats a decent mark in bio so it doesn't affect your ATAR?
I don't think you have the right idea about scaling and ATAR calculation..
 

boxhunter91

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
736
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Bio would be mid 80's physics 82-83 chem 80-81. Seriously just do your best dont waste time worrying about it. You will get a great result nevertheless.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
29
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
Even though it is not a 'main science', I didn't know where else to post, so what mark would you need to achieve a band 6 in senior science?
 

youngminii

Banned
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
2,083
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Everyone in this thread has got it all wrong.
Physics = 82~ for band 6. This is aligning people, not scaling.
This does not mean Chem and Eco will have lower cutoffs just 'cause they scale better.
I repeat: This is not scaling
Hence you cannot measure one subject's cutoffs to another
 

annabackwards

<3 Prophet 9
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
4,670
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
Everyone in this thread has got it all wrong.
Physics = 82~ for band 6. This is aligning people, not scaling.
This does not mean Chem and Eco will have lower cutoffs just 'cause they scale better.
I repeat: This is not scaling
Hence you cannot measure one subject's cutoffs to another
+1

For chem, the cut off floats around 78-very low 80s for the band 6 cut off.
For physics, very low 80s but it has been around 78 for band 6.

No idea for bio.

Also, scaling wise, Shady is right:
phys>chem>eco
the differences in scaling here are very small so it wnt effect it much
phys b6 ~82/83 but has been as low as 78 as in 2005
chem around the same, also been around 78
bio i'm not sure
 

Fortify

♪웨딩드레스
Joined
Mar 20, 2007
Messages
1,281
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
+1

For chem, the cut off floats around 78-very low 80s for the band 6 cut off.
For physics, very low 80s but it has been around 78 for band 6.

No idea for bio.

Also, scaling wise, Shady is right:
Thanks Anna.
 

missgraceful

What a joke..
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
72
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
This is probably a stupid question, but is your aligned mark based on your assesment mark?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top