Bookie
Banned
He was 700 from Souths and hes getting in the region of 600-650 from the Rooters. Anasta isnt the type to take a 200k paycut - he might as well have stayed at the Dogs.
-
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
Rooster Supporters! (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter richz
- Start date
kimi
C U Next Tuesday.
Its an assumption lol. An assumption with no validity. The Sunday Tele. said that he was getting a few 100K under so i think he might get 300k or something. Im not sure about that though/but it certainly proves we didnt go over the salary cap by signing him.templar said:
Good.Bookie said:
kimi
C U Next Tuesday.
Well the dogs did basically tell him to fuck off when they signed Mason.Bookie said:
Bookie
Banned
It meant give up to you. Kimi, give up. And get a different name. Keep on picturing Kimi Raikkonen.
kimi
C U Next Tuesday.
No im not gonna give it. And leave my name alone- dnt start me bitch !! lolBookie said:
EDIT: actually you gave up, so i win.
You cant fight me, im too good.
Last edited:
Wow, I never knew Bookie was such a Roosters fan, it looks like to me that he knows more about the roosters than his own club. Just because we ended up getting Anasta and yous didn't, and just because we get the best players from around Australia coming to the Roosters doesn't mean you can come here on this thread and start bothering Roosters supporters. Just go start a new thread "Souths" or "Sharks" or whoever you go for and get off this thread, as its for Roosters supporters ONLY.
DRAGONZ
You've Got A Friend
Waaaaaaaaaait a second, dearest Kim.kimi said:
Are you therefore saying that the Roosters signed... a reject?
Haha as much as you want to deny it, the way you worded your post means that you can't deny it
Just something on Simon Woolford relating to the Roosters.
He cops eight weeks for his tackle. Understandably, it was largely due to his poor record. But still, eight weeks for a tackle that despite going above the horizontal, never got to the stage where Slater's neck or back could have been broken.
Ryan Cross gets six for almost ripping Morrison's eye out. [See attachment]
I dunno... I just struggle to see how that's fair.
Bookie
Banned
I'll get off this thread [because this debate lives in all the nRL threads], but I didnt give in to you Kimi.
As for you #23, Iknow much more about the Sharks than I know about the Rooters, but I am here to say that they are cheats. You got Anasta? Whoop. We have a better five-eighth. He's a champion and a local boy. We have a champion halfback. You guys dont even have a confirmed halfback. And Finch will leave next year because he'll realise Anastas a softcock who cant play - Overrated piece of crap.
As for you #23, Iknow much more about the Sharks than I know about the Rooters, but I am here to say that they are cheats. You got Anasta? Whoop. We have a better five-eighth. He's a champion and a local boy. We have a champion halfback. You guys dont even have a confirmed halfback. And Finch will leave next year because he'll realise Anastas a softcock who cant play - Overrated piece of crap.
Bookie
Banned
Dragonz - Cross is from the Rorters. Woolford is from the Raiders. You have to see the world in that way.
By the way, your team gets it pretty easy as well [Barrett / Danny Williams], but then again you guys lose all your players through injury, so one one cares about your concessions.
By the way, your team gets it pretty easy as well [Barrett / Danny Williams], but then again you guys lose all your players through injury, so one one cares about your concessions.
Bookie
Banned
Walker might start playing for the Reds
DRAGONZ
You've Got A Friend
Regarding the first point, I've argued this many times before. However, it gets us nowhere, because the NRL doesn't consciously favour one team over another.Bookie said:
The Barrett/Williams comparison does have its merits, but it's also flawed. The fact that Williams argued he lost his memory etc due to the high tackle is evidence enough to suggest this.
And LOL. Injuries. Don't mention that word again... if it were a real person, I'd shoot it. Despite the fact we've had a decreased number this year, they've all been concentrated in the halves. Baz, Hornby and Head (season) have all copped it bad, and when our three chief playmakers are all out, it's practically impossible to score enough points to win matches. Imagine taking Kimmorley, Dykes and Peachey out of the Sharks, and think about if they would score even 10 points a game.
Bookie
Banned
Take Kimmorley out of the team withthe state he's in right now - we'd score a gazillion points. You can't take Peachey out. He's leaving next year, so I know we've got the wooden spoon wrapped up in blue and black ribbons.
Born Dancer
I can't go for that
Looks like you havent realised the topic of this thread bookie.. leave the poor roosters supporters alone and let them try and tell each other that the roosters are 'good'
leave the poor roosters supporters alone and let them try and tell each other that the roosters are 'good'
DRAGONZ
You've Got A Friend
Haha good to see you show faith in your side.Bookie said:
Souths are probably going to be gunning for Merritt, but if you keep him, you've got a ready-made winger, with David Simmons the incumbent fullback. I wouldn't be worrying too much.
Bookie
Banned
He sure is earning 700k.
Well, mate, you started up a thread "How come the roosters are allowed to cheat?" Mate, go back over to that thread (as you have made it too discuss how we cheat even though i know we dont cheat, we're just too good for other teams like the Sharks) and discuss this load of sh*t on how we cheat. This thread is about Roosters supporters and you're nto a Roosters supporter, so just Pee off.Bookie said: