I thnk she's innocent. There is already alot of it in the country. So would a person, with any logic, smuggle more in to sell it for a lower price than they would recieve in another country that also has more lenient penalties?
-
Want to help us with this year's BoS Trials? Let us know before 30 June. See this thread for details -
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
Schapelle Corby - Innocent or Gulity? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter [trent]
- Start date
K
katie_tully
Guest
It has nothing to do with whether she had the marijuana on her for personal use, or whether she was into drug trafficing.rantman said:
Somebody who has travelled to this part of the world before would be fully aware of their stance on drugs.
Tell me, are you going to need 4kg of marijuana for "personal" use?
she's guilty - and should own up to it - it'd probably get her a lesser sentence and death.
As a few other people said - how could you not notice the weight difference?
Who buys the story that she's innocent? Anyone?
As a few other people said - how could you not notice the weight difference?
Who buys the story that she's innocent? Anyone?
MissMacbeth
Mrs. Brandon Bruce Lee
[trent] said:
Tut, Tut, tut. Obviously you havent done the "representations" core in Advanced English. You always have to question current affairs programmes - don't take them too literally for what they "represent" to the audience!
Anywho:
INNOCENT but naive
when you travel to these kinds of places where even packing 'The Pill' for women or even panadol means death, you have to watch your bags like a hawk. I remember my dad telling mum at this airport in Bali to litterally sit on the luggage so no one could open it. You NEVER leave your luggage alone, unless it's locked up tight, or unless you wanna end up being in a horrible Asian jail...
SashatheMan
StudyforEver
lol there was this guy at school with a really heavy bag and we put a brick in it and he didnt know until everyone started laughing.katie_tully said:
but yeh that woman is guilty for shore. i hope they find more evidence agaiunst her so peopel dont question her innocence
SashatheMan
StudyforEver
she was probably trafficing that weed.
SashatheMan
StudyforEver
yeh with that name guilty for shoreArgonaut said:
Not-That-Bright
Andrew Quah
IMO she's guilty... i just can't imagine that an indonesian customers officer, the police officer on hand make this stuff up.
Also she just doesn't seem outragged enough, i would be so damn outragged if there was a possibility i cold be killed because someone decided to plant the drugs on me.
Also she just doesn't seem outragged enough, i would be so damn outragged if there was a possibility i cold be killed because someone decided to plant the drugs on me.
Danoz The Great
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2004
- Messages
- 1,105
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
She's guilty. Nobody couldn't notice that their bodyboard bag was 4kg, that's way too heavy for a bodyboard.
And the bag of pot is very similar size to the bodyboard bag. There's no way somebody could've just snuck that in thru an airport. It was placed there before the airport, hence, I believe that she put it there.
But the death penalty is wrong. However, since her sister lived there (she was visiting her sister), you'd think she'd know the penalty!
And the bag of pot is very similar size to the bodyboard bag. There's no way somebody could've just snuck that in thru an airport. It was placed there before the airport, hence, I believe that she put it there.
But the death penalty is wrong. However, since her sister lived there (she was visiting her sister), you'd think she'd know the penalty!
SashatheMan
StudyforEver
i saw the news about her again yesterday. How the channel 7 reporter went to thai land and making a point that buying drugs is so easy in that country , and then questioned the captian of the police about how they are losing the battle against drugs.
Once again i could tell that channel 7 was on Schapelles side and just creating a story to make thailand sound like they dont know anytihng about the drug problem.
Go to sydney and u can buy any of those drugs in alot of suburbs. Weed and ecstasy is really easy to even buy at schools, and if yuo want anything else just go to western suburbs or even the city. So thailand no worse then sydney.
My point is that THE MEDIA IS TRYING TO MAKE SCHAPPELLE LOOK INNOCENT fuck that, i hope she is found guilty.
Once again i could tell that channel 7 was on Schapelles side and just creating a story to make thailand sound like they dont know anytihng about the drug problem.
Go to sydney and u can buy any of those drugs in alot of suburbs. Weed and ecstasy is really easy to even buy at schools, and if yuo want anything else just go to western suburbs or even the city. So thailand no worse then sydney.
My point is that THE MEDIA IS TRYING TO MAKE SCHAPPELLE LOOK INNOCENT fuck that, i hope she is found guilty.
Not-That-Bright
Andrew Quah
Before you enter customs there are big signs asking people to give up their drugs as the punishment for drug trafficing is death...
She's guilty, she knew what she was doing, she knew what the consequences would be if she was caught.
She's guilty, she knew what she was doing, she knew what the consequences would be if she was caught.
Not-That-Bright
Andrew Quah
no.. if she was outragged i'd think "that's how i'd be in that situation".
How many people picked up by australian customs claim it was placed on them?
How many people picked up by australian customs claim it was placed on them?
thaoroxy2001
Bored member
innocent till proven guilty[trent] said:
Did anyone read the thing in last weeks paper? i think it was in the Saturday herald. It was like a massive article and mostly points for her.. it really made me think she could be innocent.. points that were made included:
- why would she import it over to Indonesia to sell when its worth ALOT more here
- why was it in full view of anyone opening the bag, rather than hidden behind or at the bottom
It also explained about baggage handlers transport drugs in passengers luggage for another handler to pick up (who would have been in sydney) and they could have either just missed it or it was on the wrong flight altogether. I dont know about the rest of you but being a bit naive I wasnt aware that this happened!!
So yeah anyway I did think she was guilty before but after reading that it definitely puts doubt in my mind.
- why would she import it over to Indonesia to sell when its worth ALOT more here
- why was it in full view of anyone opening the bag, rather than hidden behind or at the bottom
It also explained about baggage handlers transport drugs in passengers luggage for another handler to pick up (who would have been in sydney) and they could have either just missed it or it was on the wrong flight altogether. I dont know about the rest of you but being a bit naive I wasnt aware that this happened!!
So yeah anyway I did think she was guilty before but after reading that it definitely puts doubt in my mind.
LOL! That's pretty funny.cherryblossom said:
No, I'm not bagging out christianity.. just that you're making it sound like a criteria for a civilised country.
But I do support the death penalty in the case of drug trafficking... Indonesia is in a bad position as it is... they don't need more drugs to make things worse.
Last edited: