Stuart made it because he's a proven wicket taker. You're naive if you think age has anything to do with performance.Bookie said:Cant wait to see the Proteas!
Anyway, how the hell did Stuart make it? How old is he?
DT should have been in the squad from day one, but nooooooo, apprently a thousand centuries and a hell of a lot of wickets doesn't warrant anything more than a Aus A selection.
When the one-day squads are announced post world-cup don't be surprised to see his name in the mix. His game is suited to that format, and he's a class fieldsman - some have said the best in the world.LaCe said:DT? Thornely?? That is ridiculous. He will never play for Australia cause he just isnt good enough. .
Good old long Tom. I remember those massive blows of his in the '99 wc to get us into the super six.copious said:You dont have to have the power of Symonds or the bowling of Flintoff to be a good all rounder. Look at guys like Tom Moody and Chris Harris who were good at a little bit of everything yet suceeded.
lol yeah I remember, he was good. Funny thing is its been only 6 years on and hes coaching Sri Lanka, what a champ.Smokey_22 said:Good old long Tom. I remember those massive blows of his in the '99 wc to get us into the super six.
Definitly agreeing with you there! Harris and cairns were NZ's saving grace at the 99 WC, and what about watson? He should have been put in above clarke, had lee and mcgrath not been passed fitcopious said:You dont have to have the power of Symonds or the bowling of Flintoff to be a good all rounder. Look at guys like Tom Moody and Chris Harris who were good at a little bit of everything yet suceeded.