Band cut offs? (1 Viewer)

[roookie]

aaaaaah i got 1.76 but i wrote GRAMS i donno why

 

[mitchwong650]

For nitrogen i think i got 1.77% as well. does anyone remember amount of significant figures though?

and that was really quite easy, i'm thinking around 85+ for band 6

 

[Monsterman]

It would be 85+ considering that it wasnt that difficult. The multiple choice maybe considered a bit difficult but the questions werent that bad so it would had balanced out..
85+ raw

 

[SmileyFacedTash]

It would be 85+ considering that it wasnt that difficult. The multiple choice maybe considered a bit difficult but the questions werent that bad so it would had balanced out..
85+ raw

what would be the cutoff to get a early band5???

 

[clintmyster]

the test had its easy and hard parts. somewhat hard MC. Industrial was quite easy but some of those core questions, its quite easy to lose a mark here and there so the cut-off should be 80/100

 

[buildabridge]

and for the heat of combustion, did you have to multiply the heat by 2, to cover for the heat loss?

yep.

 

[greekmagician]

It would be 85+ considering that it wasnt that difficult. The multiple choice maybe considered a bit difficult but the questions werent that bad so it would had balanced out..
85+ raw

85+, i highly doubt that. Its chem were talking about here.

 

[GT03]

I found it similar to past papers, and industrial was fair. im guessing around 80 raw as well.
Anyone know what ~90 raw would align to?

 

[emilyo]

yay all my guessed mc were b so it paid off

 

[boxhunter91]

the test had its easy and hard parts. somewhat hard MC. Industrial was quite easy but some of those core questions, its quite easy to lose a mark here and there so the cut-off should be 80/100

+1 Industrial was dead on. Easy to lose marks in core and MC.
So low 80's is a def go.
I might even have a chance of pulling 80+ raw.

I found it similar to past papers, and industrial was fair. im guessing around 80 raw as well.
Anyone know what ~90 raw would align to?

90 raw would align to 95 i would say.
Well done mate.

 

[greekmagician]

83/100 people, band 6 material?

 

[hpulido]

If B6 is low-80's, would Band 5 cut-off be around 70/100?

 

[boxhunter91]

Yup hpulido.
In 2003. 61 in exam gave 79.
So definitly.

 

[bored of sc]

Yup hpulido.
In 2003. 61 in exam gave 79.
So definitly.

Cool. I might just scrape a band 5 then.

 

[Twickel]

If 61 got aligned up to 79 then wouldnt 63 get into the band 5 range?

 

[TechnIx]

If 61 got aligned up to 79 then wouldnt 63 get into the band 5 range?

Yup about there.

Also, remember that was for the 2003 exam, which many consider to be fairly easy.

This exam was harder, so it may even boost you higher

 

[X2RADialbomber]

Cool. I might just scrape a band 5 then.

Same

 

[hpulido]

Cool! It might even be like 58-59 this year (hopefully)

 

[siddharthlaha]

i think ill probably get around 65-75 raw
hopefully that will scale to a band 5, im aiming for around 80

 

[cdiddy7]

Forensics was really straight forward
Multiple choice got tricky, so many questions had only slight variations between answers
Hoping and praying for 85
But even the 70s will do
Those 6 markers were really good
Howd everyone find that phosphate question