It would be 85+ considering that it wasnt that difficult. The multiple choice maybe considered a bit difficult but the questions werent that bad so it would had balanced out..
85+ raw
yep.and for the heat of combustion, did you have to multiply the heat by 2, to cover for the heat loss?
85+, i highly doubt that. Its chem were talking about here.It would be 85+ considering that it wasnt that difficult. The multiple choice maybe considered a bit difficult but the questions werent that bad so it would had balanced out..
85+ raw
+1 Industrial was dead on. Easy to lose marks in core and MC.the test had its easy and hard parts. somewhat hard MC. Industrial was quite easy but some of those core questions, its quite easy to lose a mark here and there so the cut-off should be 80/100
90 raw would align to 95 i would say.I found it similar to past papers, and industrial was fair. im guessing around 80 raw as well.
Anyone know what ~90 raw would align to?
Cool. I might just scrape a band 5 then.Yup hpulido.
In 2003. 61 in exam gave 79.
So definitly.
Yup about there.If 61 got aligned up to 79 then wouldnt 63 get into the band 5 range?
SameCool. I might just scrape a band 5 then.