Search results

the module is concerned with looking at humans and their relationship with the natural world (which includes nature/emotions/relationships etc). You are supposed to compare the two texts in terms of the above relationship and make reference to the context (and how they have influenced...

just come up with some bullshit opinion that you back up = marks

this man speaks the truth.

Instead of pages can't you guys say how many words? some people write big, some write small....hard to compare...

that's a turn-on....especially when you do that and pinch their nostrils so they can't breathe...

I got so scared though........I mean that Olaf guy just kept turning up everywhere in various disguises....he was so relentless......

I want that gaming mouse...G7 right? how much did you get it for?

you do realise that they're aligned marks that are supposed to go in SAM....also it's pretty pointless trying to guess your mark now. Just focus on hsc.

Hey guys just wondering if it's possible to transfer/pick-up a double degree say at the end of a semester or end of the first year. I say this because I am interested in a double degree but I doubt I'll be able to make the cutoff for one of them, so I figured I'd do the other half first (which...

I'd hit it

I think what he's saying is that you might give people some "ideas"...

yeah but creative is usually easy to remember since it's not dead boring and follows a logic progression (i hope). try memorising a whole essay....

no pun intended i hope. (sorry i can't help myself)

Just another thing with your "personal interpretation"........are you allowed to use first person?

Yes that seems correct. I mentioned that a few posts back:

edit: dw

do note that that support document was published 4 September 2007, hence the information in there did not apply to them.

I know that interpretations shift with context, but how do you get away with mentioning an interpretation without naming it? do you say something like: "Recently Lear has been interpreted in this way...blah blah" "another interesting adaption changed this part blah blah etc" is this right?

Ok i think it's safe to say that you need to focus on the original text, form your own opinion, then compare that to other perspectives which "should enhance rather than overshadow a student’s personal engagement with and close analysis of the prescribed text." Also note that: "The syllabus...

how about you read the module document before jumping to conclusions? I think you're just in denial because you don't want to have to change your essay plan/structure