Ever. For anything. Leisurely reading inclusive.Twilight - no.
Definitely not.![]()
Students helping students, join us in improving boredofstudies.org by donating and supporting future learners!
Ever. For anything. Leisurely reading inclusive.Twilight - no.
Definitely not.![]()
Ulysses is full of rich literary techniques, a veritable gold mine really. But unless you can adequately extract the main ideas within it that concern belonging, don't do it.is ulysses good? or is it too complicated?
I'm using Marching Powder by Rusty Young for a related text, with the prescribed text Strictly ballroom. Would anybody have an idea, if this could work?
Belonging:
* Prisoners need to belong to a block, or they live in an open area
* Prisoners need to belong to a family in order to receive money and supplies
* Prisoners need to belong to an accepted crimes list - by that I mean if they have raped or killed children, they do not belong, hence they are secluded and sometimes killed.
* Prisoners need to belong to a group within a gaol for safety
* Prisoners need to belong to the corrupt practices inside the prison.
In saying the above, can this be used to help argue a point, including Strictly ballroom?
I want to contrast the two texts. Strictly ballroom deals with the urge to break away from the group, whereas, Marching powder deals more with the urge to fit in to a group.what point to strictly ballroom are you trying to argue?