Legal Studies Predictions/Thoughts (2 Viewers)

[civiclens]

yessss i’m 95% sure i’ve done a multi like that in a past paper too

SAME!!! I swear there was a mcq on that before

 

[bas216]

Yeah but Religion was the only opition that is actually expressed in the consititution, all the others were just implied rights, so I think it was the "most correct"

religion and trade are both explicit but religion was right bc its individual (i hope)

 

[bas216]

what did people do for mcq 14. it was like sam pleaded guilty to a crime with a defence. what is next.

i said the criminal culpability one, as like doesn't he have to prove his defence? that was tricky...

yep same i had a whole essay ready for defences lol so that helped

 

[thicckoolkid]

what did people do for mcq 14. it was like sam pleaded guilty to a crime with a defence. what is next.

i said the criminal culpability one, as like doesn't he have to prove his defence? that was tricky...

Same I did it because if he used a defence, then either he or the prosecution needs to prove mens rea (except for like provocation of self-defence) to make him culpable. Idk if thats right I was lowkey so out of it

 

[civiclens]

yep same i had a whole essay ready for defences lol so that helped

okay good same... i think i spent 5 mins at the end staring at it!

 

[bas216]

Same I did it because if he used a defence, then either he or the prosecution needs to prove mens rea (except for like provocation of self-defence) to make him culpable. Idk if thats right I was lowkey so out of it

100% correct

 

[civiclens]

maybe we arent all as fucked...

 

[thicckoolkid]

100% correct

Thank the lorddddd

 

[bas216]

also for 20 did anyone say the court of appeal (i cant really remember the Q)

i should probs stop worrying abt multis and lock in for business...

 

[civiclens]

also for 20 did anyone say the court of appeal (i cant really remember the Q)

i should probs stop worrying abt multis and lock in for business...

yes!!! as fraud is either district or supreme, thus appeals are to the NSWCCA.

 

[questionasking]

what did people do for mcq 14. it was like sam pleaded guilty to a crime with a defence. what is next.

i said the criminal culpability one, as like doesn't he have to prove his defence? that was tricky...

yes i did that one too! i forget why but 2 optiosn i ruled out immediately. i ruled out the jury one cause the jury cant do anything until the case is presented. so that was my final option

 

[hey2737]

what was the answer for the crypto thing?

 

[nini00]

what was the answer for the crypto thing?

no idea but i put one of the two options that had div of powers in it idk

 

[ajksdfoasiudh]

guys would i be cooked for using more than one example for the 7 marker?
i covered 3 mechanisms for diff

 

[thicckoolkid]

guys would i be cooked for using more than one example for the 7 marker?
i covered 3 mechanisms for diff

nah the more examples/detail the better. I literally went into an extra booklet, don't stress it shows your knowledge

 

[ajksdfoasiudh]

nah i know but like i did diff human rights issues ykwim? like some ppl apparantly thought it was specifically one contemporary issue and i did more ykwim?

nah the more examples/detail the better. I literally went into an extra booklet, don't stress it shows your knowledge

 

[clay293]

Yeah but Religion was the only opition that is actually expressed in the consititution, all the others were just implied rights, so I think it was the "most correct"

but the 4th option was free trade no? also why would they specify individual rights if the answer would be a collective right

 

[civiclens]

what was the answer for the crypto thing?

div and separation i believe. that is a dot point in human rights, so i will assume that is right

 

[thicckoolkid]

nah i know but like i did diff human rights issues ykwim? like some ppl apparantly thought it was specifically one contemporary issue and i did more ykwim?

Nah I don't think it's an issue. Also, I'm pretty sure it said "example", not contemporary issue, which they normally specify.

 

[ajksdfoasiudh]

div and separation

wouldn't it be rule of law tho? no state is above constitution.?