MedVision ad

Same-Sex Marriage (6 Viewers)

Are you for or against same-sex marriage?


  • Total voters
    122

scuba_steve2121

On The Road To Serfdom
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
1,343
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
If we're going to take what is in Leviticus or what other Old Testament books about living life as the sole indicator to what Christians believe... you're doing it wrong.
anti homo message also in romans bro
 

kaz1

et tu
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
6,960
Location
Vespucci Beach
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2018
If we're going to take what is in Leviticus or what other Old Testament books about living life as the sole indicator to what Christians believe... you're doing it wrong.
Why'd they put Leviticus in there if they ignore it all?
 

cosmomatthews

New Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
8
Location
Northern Beaches
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
As far as I see it, the only valid argument that a person could have against same-sex marriage is that under definition 'marriage' is between a man and a woman, so same-sex marriage is impossible. However, the law is created in the first place to reflect society's values and opinions, which are obviously changing on this subject, so in the end there really is no valid argument against it. And as for people 'getting bullied for have 2 dads or 2 mums', I guess it depends on where you live, but nothing like that would ever happen where I live in Sydney. I have a few friends who's parents have re-married the same sex or they've been adopted, and we love them and their parents just the same. A persons sexuality shouldn't even enter the equation as far as I'm concerned.
 

LonelyWolf

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2011
Messages
1,031
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
As far as I see it, the only valid argument that a person could have against same-sex marriage is that under definition 'marriage' is between a man and a woman, so same-sex marriage is impossible. However, the law is created in the first place to reflect society's values and opinions, which are obviously changing on this subject, so in the end there really is no valid argument against it. And as for people 'getting bullied for have 2 dads or 2 mums', I guess it depends on where you live, but nothing like that would ever happen where I live in Sydney. I have a few friends who's parents have re-married the same sex or they've been adopted, and we love them and their parents just the same. A persons sexuality shouldn't even enter the equation as far as I'm concerned.
argument against gays having children: its unnatural / immoral
 

Arcorn

Ban ned
Joined
Nov 18, 2009
Messages
1,143
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
argument against gays having children: its unnatural / immoral
Homosexuality has been discovered in over 4000 species. Homophobia is only evident in one. Which seems unnatural now?
 

Ivorytw

Middle Management
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
1,067
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
If they use their spit as lube it's natural.
 

Shadowdude

Cult of Personality
Joined
Sep 19, 2009
Messages
12,145
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Why'd they put Leviticus in there if they ignore it all?
Go and ask a priest.

Something to do with Jesus making the old law obsolete and creating the Great Commission I think it's called.
 

boris

Banned
Joined
May 6, 2004
Messages
4,671
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
gods teachings not acceptable in civilised society
ignore teachings
 

Riproot

Addiction Psychiatrist
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
8,228
Location
I don’t see how that’s any of your business…
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2017
Go and ask a priest.

Something to do with Jesus making the old law obsolete and creating the Great Commission I think it's called.
*Incorrect buzzer noise*
Paul of Tarsus said that the teachings of the Torah were covered by Christ and all that shit.
But he's the same guy that was for women in the Church and then wrote "let them ask their husbands at home; for it is a shame for women to speak in the Church" in Corinthians.
 

Garygaz

Active Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
1,827
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
i still don't get this debate. do i support gays/lesbians getting full recognition, tax benefits and the other legal benefits of being married? yes.

however, i don't support it being called a 'marriage'. the simple fact is that marriage has been the term that has denoted a bond between a man and a woman for thousands of years. as much as i think religious people are bat shit insane, the word marriage has large religious connotations and a lot of tradition to it. if you gave gays/lesbians all of the rights i mentioned above, yet just called it a 'civil union' or whatever, what's the difference? i don't go around and whinge that i can't be classified as a negro, it's because i'm not, i don't fit the definition.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)

Top