Ohh , you didnt get what I was saying.ugh no i am against paying $8xx dollars per person to pay for it
i think its a great idea
but not if i am made to pay for it
the gov spend the cash but we provide itbut wartortle, the govt spends the $857 not the people
Agreed.100mbps sounds good, but the cost is too much.
I hope you're trolling or you're the worst fucking libertarian/anarcho-capitalist I have ever met.we need 100mbps internet speed for economic growth
OLD WAYNE PETROL BOWSER. "DOUBLE". HOBART Pick Up. - eBay, Petrol, Advertising, Collectables. (end time 07-May-10 21:18:32 AEST)aboriginals arent going to utilise 100mbps internet to download petrol are they
(or are they?)
and they are lagging in quality of life, the rest of us are leading the world
If we're talking intangibles, look at the opportunity cost of not spending the $18bn, i.e. massive sacrifices in economic growth.
I hope you're trolling or you're the worst fucking libertarian/anarcho-capitalist I have ever met.
I recall suggesting around the time of last years budget that the government were trying to create inflated expectations of debt so they could turn round and say "hey look its nowhere near as bad as everyone thought, aren't we swell." I didn't specify where I thought the money was being stashed but in a way I suggested they were making their projects seem less affordable than they actually are.So much for the $43 billion dollar figure.
A comprehensive study of the infrastructure project concludes that the cost would be between $25 and $35 billion, of which half will be funded by private industry, for a cost of between $13 billion and $18 billion to the government, depending on factors such as whether Telstra is on board or not.
Significantly less than predicted by both government (initially) and critics.
NBN study to be revealed today
Edit: I forgot to mention that this is over 8 years. Up to $18 billion over 8 years, so about $2 billion per year.
Yeah, I was fully expecting this - it's a typical Rudd thing to do, and I believe you're 100% correct.I recall suggesting around the time of last years budget that the government were trying to create inflated expectations of debt so they could turn round and say "hey look its nowhere near as bad as everyone thought, aren't we swell." I didn't specify where I thought the money was being stashed but in a way I suggested they were making their projects seem less affordable than they actually are.