Physics vs. Chemistry. (2 Viewers)

Physics vs Chemistry.

  • Chemistry > Physics

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • HATE THEM BOTH!

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1

h3ll h0und

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
341
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
4u >>>>>> phys and chem
phys and chem are about the same . IMO chemistry is much easier than physics, but physics is more interesting.
 

Existential

Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
620
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
You do realise that without physics, you'd have no decent infrastructure, cars, electricty etc etc right? XD
you realise that without biology you would have no humans to work with physics and chemistry.

on another scale:

biology > earth and environmental science
 

Chemical Ali

지금은 소녀시대
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,728
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
EES is basically science for dummies (but still better than senior science), like it's fully intended to be easier.

I'd lol if they brought out a new curriculum with a really rigorous tough geology course, and made physics the easy subject!
 

Chemical Ali

지금은 소녀시대
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,728
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Also, it's not really true to say that without physics we wouldn't have electricity or whatever... all the physics behind that was done over 100 years ago, the physics component is trivial now, it's all engineering & construction.

You want usefulness? Genetics research alone gets more funding than phys & chem put together :cool:
 

h3ll h0und

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
341
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
you can't compare chemistry, physics and biology in terms of how useful they are, individually, to society. they all work together to make our quality of life better...but without them i think we would still be living....but we'd live with a crappier lifestyle.
 

annabackwards

<3 Prophet 9
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
4,670
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
you realise that without biology you would have no humans to work with physics and chemistry.
LOL. Biology is the study of living organisms etc etc. It's not the interaction/creation of living organisms so humans would still exist :p

Also, it's not really true to say that without physics we wouldn't have electricity or whatever... all the physics behind that was done over 100 years ago, the physics component is trivial now, it's all engineering & construction.

You want usefulness? Genetics research alone gets more funding than phys & chem put together :cool:
Engineers use physics and other fields - physics is hence by no means "trivial".

Yeah and most of the genetics research is thrown out the door because it's controversial lol.

you can't compare chemistry, physics and biology in terms of how useful they are, individually, to society. they all work together to make our quality of life better...but without them i think we would still be living....but we'd live with a crappier lifestyle.
*nods*
 

Existential

Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
620
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
EES is basically science for dummies (but still better than senior science), like it's fully intended to be easier.

I'd lol if they brought out a new curriculum with a really rigorous tough geology course, and made physics the easy subject!
the NSW course 'earth and environmental science' makes it sound a pushover.

geology would be be better.

but of course even the national curriculum run by victorians decided that the name is good enough.

however im glad that they didn't introduce a senior science course. the downside here is even after the national (victorian) curriculum is implemented, state subjects that aren't replaced still remain...
 

mirakon

nigga
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
4,222
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
You do realise that without chem, you'd have no materials to build the decent infrastructure, cars, electricity etc etc right? XD

I still liek Physics betterer though...
You do realise without maths, none of those would be effective. so yeah, maths, ftw.
 

Existential

Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
620
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Also, it's not really true to say that without physics we wouldn't have electricity or whatever... all the physics behind that was done over 100 years ago, the physics component is trivial now, it's all engineering & construction.

You want usefulness? Genetics research alone gets more funding than phys & chem put together :cool:
genetics=biology

LOL. Biology is the study of living organisms etc etc. It's not the interaction/creation of living organisms so humans would still exist :p
biology IS the study of organisms, therefore if you take the study of organisms out of the equation, humans would not be able to evolve and discover the science behind chemistry and physics.
 

annabackwards

<3 Prophet 9
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
4,670
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
biology IS the study of organisms, therefore if you take the study of organisms out of the equation, humans would not be able to evolve and discover the science behind chemistry and physics.
LOLOLOLOL.

Even if we "take the study of organisms out of the equation", humans would still evolve and chem/physics would evolve. That is of course the case with all other scpeicies on this earth - not just humans.
 

kaz1

et tu
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
6,960
Location
Vespucci Beach
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2018
genetics=biology



biology IS the study of organisms, therefore if you take the study of organisms out of the equation, humans would not be able to evolve and discover the science behind chemistry and physics.
That crap can be reduced to Chemistry which is then reduced to Phyics the fundamental science.
 

4025808

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
4,377
Location
中國農村稻農
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2017
nah screw them....

4U maths, music 2 and modern history >>>>> physics and chem :p

gahhh i hate science in general, keep falling asleep in those lessons >_<
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top